According to an article I read today in Realtor Magazine Online, more consumers prefer to be contacted by email rather than by telephone. The survey was conducted by the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® , but nearly half of the real estate practitioners polled by the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® communicate via telephone. 
Personally, I prefer to communicate with my clients by email. I feel I can be quick and to the point and it is just more efficient for me. However, it does not and should not replace actual verbal communication. Because emails can be interpreted wrong if you are not careful, a follow up phone chat may keep relations stronger. A post in WorkShak focuses on a study by two scholars, Michael Morris and Jeff Lowenstein, pertaining to the dangers of email and other computer based interactions. They have identified some common problems with email communication;
- Lack of facial expressions and tone of voice can lead to misinterpretation
- Lack of personal rapport makes for more fragile relationships
- The prospect of instantaneous communication creates an urgency that pressures e-mailers to instantaneous respond before carefully planning their reply.
In my business, I tend to write the email, re-write the email, then read it aloud before sending to be certain that the words that I choose are not going to be misinterpreted. Because you should know, if there is a possibility of misinterpretation in an email, it will be misinterpreted. A good rule of thumb is, if the communication is more than a few sentences,
include voice or a personal visit when communicating with clients or
colleagues for utmost report.
How do you prefer to be contacted??? Is email too impersonal for you??? Weigh in today!
Technorati Tags: email communication, email interpretation, email misinterpretation, real estate and email


I much prefer to talk to clients through email. I think it's partly because I have documentation of conversations that way. When i do talk on the phone, I always try to smile while I'm talking because I agree that people can "hear" the smile in your voice.
Posted by: Kathy T. | August 3rd, 2007 11:34 pm |
I agree with you on the documentation. I had a circumstance once where a builder tried to not pay my commission by saying that I did not contact the new home community before sending my client over. I had several emails that documented that I was the "procuring cause" for that sale and that I in deed contacted the builder as it was discussed in an email with my client. I took them to arbitration and won because of my email trail! Unfortunately, it makes for a very large inbox and archives, but well worth it!
I am also a notorious re-writer. I read aloud to my staff and they tell me if something could possibly be taken wrong whenever I am responding to something that strikes emotion.
Posted by: Kathy H. | August 4th, 2007 11:58 am |
I am in sales & understand the reasons behind preferring email however it is not the best route to go, for your points you made. Email can and will be mis-interpreted and you can never get a reaction like you can over the phone or face to face. Where I use email is to follow up, reconfirming what I know is true. Secondly, you can never, ever, take back an email. It can be forwarded & printed etc…
As a consumer, I prefer email to be as a follow up as I like the personal touch of a human on the phone. Hope that helped!
Posted by: Kim | August 4th, 2007 9:12 pm |
Thanks Kim for your input. You also made some great points. And you are right, you can't take it back!
Posted by: Kathy Helbig | August 4th, 2007 10:06 pm |
I vastly prefer to be contacted by email. Phone calls interrupt everything I'm doing, but I can deal with email on my own time, when I have time.
Posted by: Ivy | August 6th, 2007 2:08 pm |
That's right about documentation for arbitration… forgot all about it. I once won an arbitration hearing because of email establishing my agency status and that I had introduced buyers to a home.
Posted by: Kathy T. | August 9th, 2007 11:27 pm |
Love to hear stories like these. We work hard for our commission and don't deserve the treatment that we often get.
Posted by: Kathy Helbig | August 10th, 2007 9:47 am |